Game of Statements

Selig was contemptuous and evasive. Clearly, he abhors Bonds. Unfortunately, he is ensnared. His choices? Sanction the steroid era or convict Bonds. Schilling was direct. He assailed Bonds. However, his reasoning was brilliant. If Bonds were innocent, why not sure? Arnold was believable. Obviously, he is a criminal. With that stated, he perfected cheating. He would know a cheater.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home