When the Levees Broke: A Film Worth Watching
Last night, I viewed “When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts.” Director Spike Lee is vehemently anti-President Bush. His revulsion has been stated. With that noted, his film is objective and fair. The production does not rely on archival footage. The documentary is diversified with interviews. Interviewees include Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco; New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin; city residents Phyllis Montana LeBlanc, Kimberly Polk, Shelton "Shakespeare" Alexander and Reverand Williams; former Presidential Candidate and activist Al Sharpton; actor and Bush despiser Harry Belafonte; CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien; musicians Wynton Marsalis, Terence Blanchard and Kanye West.
“When the Levees Broke” televises a complicated portrait. Alternating between pre and post Katrina, viewers observe chaos. Chaos as federal, state, and local officials debate preparation and evacuation. Chaos as the levees breech and frightened residents attempt to endure and exit the ravaged city. “When the Levees Broke” codifies and presents every emotion and storyline. The vilifying is mostly the viewer’s responsibility.
Mostly. President Bush stereotypes and criticism are conspicuous. They do not permeate the film. However, “Brownie you’re doing a heck of a job” is repeated. Questions and statements concerning Bush’s mental acumen are broached. Sharpton and Belafonte’s criticism is vocal. As stated, the film is not blatantly critical. Yet, one must acknowledge the occasional viewpoint.
Brilliantly, the documentary is sans narration. Subjects words and emotions shape the recitation. Additionally, the footage is real. People are shown within the aftermath. They are not news piece props. There is not voiced commentary. Viewers’ feelings are not manipulated, directed, or forced. The aforesaid is the production’s finest trait.
Hurricane Katrina was America’s worst natural disaster. Katrina was also both historical and defining. Thousands survived, hundreds died, several either were heroic or disgraced themselves. Lee’s presentation of the words and events is magnificent. No one should forget Katrina’s impact. Everyone should view “When the Levees Broke.”
“When the Levees Broke” televises a complicated portrait. Alternating between pre and post Katrina, viewers observe chaos. Chaos as federal, state, and local officials debate preparation and evacuation. Chaos as the levees breech and frightened residents attempt to endure and exit the ravaged city. “When the Levees Broke” codifies and presents every emotion and storyline. The vilifying is mostly the viewer’s responsibility.
Mostly. President Bush stereotypes and criticism are conspicuous. They do not permeate the film. However, “Brownie you’re doing a heck of a job” is repeated. Questions and statements concerning Bush’s mental acumen are broached. Sharpton and Belafonte’s criticism is vocal. As stated, the film is not blatantly critical. Yet, one must acknowledge the occasional viewpoint.
Brilliantly, the documentary is sans narration. Subjects words and emotions shape the recitation. Additionally, the footage is real. People are shown within the aftermath. They are not news piece props. There is not voiced commentary. Viewers’ feelings are not manipulated, directed, or forced. The aforesaid is the production’s finest trait.
Hurricane Katrina was America’s worst natural disaster. Katrina was also both historical and defining. Thousands survived, hundreds died, several either were heroic or disgraced themselves. Lee’s presentation of the words and events is magnificent. No one should forget Katrina’s impact. Everyone should view “When the Levees Broke.”
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home